Skip to main content

Solving Cheryl's Birthday Problem.

Okay I'm taking a break for a moment to analyze a brain teaser.  This one was posted to the New York Times:

Albert and Bernard just met Cheryl.

“When’s your birthday?” Albert asked Cheryl.

 Cheryl thought a second and said, “I’m not going to tell you, but I’ll give you some clues.”

She wrote down a list of 10 dates: May 15 — May 16 — May 19 June 17 — June 18 July 14 — July 16 August 14 — August 15 — August 17 “My birthday is one of these,” she said.

Then Cheryl whispered in Albert’s ear the month — and only the month — of her birthday.

To Bernard, she whispered the day, and only the day. “Can you figure it out now?” she asked Albert. 

Albert: I don’t know when your birthday is, but I know Bernard doesn’t know, either.

Bernard: I didn’t know originally, but now I do.

Albert: Well, now I know, too!

 When is Cheryl’s birthday?


Several Solutions have been posted here and here.  Unfortunately each has a flaw in its logic and is wrong.

The analysis begins soundly enough.  Albert doesn't know, and he knows that Bernard doesn't know either.  Since Bernard was only told the day we can rule out 19 and 18 since they each have only one month associated with them.  That leaves us with the following possibilities.

May 15, 16
June 17
July 14, 16
August 14, 15, 17

Now we need to look back at the very first statement, Albert doesn't know.  Albert only knows the month, so we can eliminate June, since it only has one day associated with it that's not ruled out.  For some reason, both the Times and The Guardian eliminate May at the same time, but May is still a definite possibility.  Bernard could have been told either 15 or 16, and the statement would still be logically true.
*Update* On reading the comments section, NYT claims that May has to be eliminated because otherwise Albert would not be able to make the statement that Bernard does not know either.  i.e. If he had been told May he wouldn't be able to eliminate May 19th and definitively state that Bernard does not know either.  However a person can infer from Cheryl's behavior and statements that she did not give such an easy answer to Bernard and not Albert.


That leaves us with the following possibilities:

May 15, 16
July 14, 16
August 14, 15, 17

The next statement is that Bernard did not originally know, but now he does.  Remember he only knows the day.  The only possibility at this point that satisfies this statement is August 17th.  Bernard was clearly told 17, but could not deduce between June and August until June 17th was eliminated.  The correct answer is August 17th.

The third statement is that Albert knows too.  Once Bernard deduced the correct answer and revealed that he knew, Albert can use his powers of deduction to realize that August 17th is the only possible explanation.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A New Chapter: Putting Old Tools To New Use

 I've begun a new chapter in my life.  A few months ago my family moved to Cherry Hill, NJ after living in Norfolk, VA for over sixteen years.  My wife got a great call in Philadelphia, and I'm currently looking for my next call.  In the mean time I'm keeping busy. I decided to take my skills in Congregational Development and bring them to the online world.  I launched a Facebook page called Ministry Development , and I'm following Russell Brunson's model in Expert Secrets to reach as wide an audience as possible. My goal for this phase is to dedicate 2024 to learning, developing, and teaching the art of storytelling as a vehicle for sharing faith.  This is remarkably different from the idea that many people have in their heads.  In some quick Facebook polls, I found that many people fear sharing their faith for one of two reasons.  The first is that they have had bad experiences with evangelists in the past - the kind where someone would get in your face and tell y

My Journey: How I got here

In the summer of 2023 my wife received a phone call, offering her a job as rector of Christ Church Philadelphia.  I was excited as the prospect of moving closer to family, it was a great opportunity for her, so we made the decision to accept.  After the goodbye tears at our old congregations we watched all of our belongings being packed into a moving van and made the trek up to the Northeast.  When we arrived and settled in to our new home I began looking for a call myself so we both could exercise our priestly ministries.  Then the responses started coming in.  “No, no, no thank you, no, heck no, this isn’t a good fit, no, no, no, and no.”  In between fits of rage and general despair I started to pray, “Okay God, here I am.  I want to serve and add value.  What would you have me do?” As one does when pondering, I distracted myself with Facebook.   An ad came up offering a free masterclass on how to earn a living online as a musician.   It looked intriguing, and I love playing music so

Setbacks, Disappointments, and New Opportunities

Yesterday I received a phone call I had been waiting anxiously for. It was about a job I had put in for - and I didn’t get it. The person delivering the news was kind, and even encouraged me to apply for another position that, in her opinion, was a better fit for me. It is a different kind of job, would require a decent commute, and I’m not sure I have it in me to enter another process right now.  This morning I got myself showered and dressed and put on my clericals. Even though I was home all day I wanted to shoot a video and hence the outfit. Somehow just dressing up had me feeling less dejected - like I still could do something I was proud of. I remember years ago when my dad was looking for work. Each day he put on a shirt and tie before filling out job applications.  After the video I scheduled some more content, opened up my notebook, and started working on my plan. The ideas began to flow, time seemed to flow by, and before I knew it I had a pretty great outline for a half day